Elon Musk is facing yet another lawsuit regarding the $1 million voter lottery run by his political action committee America PAC. It seems that in defending himself against the first lawsuit, he provided fuel for a second one.
Filed to a Texas District Court by an Arizona resident on Tuesday, the new 14-page class action lawsuit accuses Musk and America PAC of fraud and breach of contract relating to the $1 million giveaway launched last month.
SEE ALSO: Judge refuses to stop Elon Musk’s million dollar election 'sweepstakes'Open to registered voters in the seven swing states of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Nevada, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, and North Carolina, Musk's $1 million daily giveaway required participants to provide their personal information and sign a petition supporting the First and Second Amendments. Musk and America PAC offered $47 to each signatory "in appreciation for [their] support," and stated that those who signed would also go into a random draw to win $1 million, with a new winner chosen each day from Oct. 19.
Tuesday's class action now claims that the selection of $1 million winners wasn't random at all, and that Musk and America PAC falsely stated it was in order to entice people to sign their petition.
The case specifically references statements made in a previous case concerning Musk's giveaway brought by Philadelphia's district attorney Larry Krasner. In said case, Krasner accused Musk and America PAC of running an illegal lottery, attempting to influence voters, and violating consumer protection laws by making "deceptive, vague or misleading statements."
Of course, Musk denied such allegations. The defense claimed that the apparent lottery winners were in fact America PAC spokespeople, and that the ostensible $1 million winnings were actually paychecks. Further, each recipient was chosen based on their personal stories, and signed contracts with America PAC.
"The $1 million recipients are not chosen by chance," said Musk's lawyer Chris Gober. "We know exactly who will be announced as the $1 million recipient today and tomorrow."
A judge ruled in favour of Musk on Monday, deciding that the $1 million America PAC giveaway could continue. Even so, the judgment initially appeared to have little material impact considering that the lottery was scheduled to end on Election Day regardless.
However, Musk and America PAC's defense in said case directly contradicted their public claims that the winners of the $1 million giveaway would be chosen at random, sparking this new class action lawsuit just one day later.
"Defendants’ statements indicating that individuals who signed the petition would be chosen at random to win $1,000,000 were false, and Defendants knew those statements were false at the time they were made," read the class action suit.
"Had Plaintiff been aware that she had no chance of receiving $1,000,000, she would not have signed or supported the America PAC petition and would not have provided her [personal identifying information] to Defendants."
In addition to at least $5 million in damages, the lawsuit is requesting the destruction of all personal identifying information that Musk and America PAC collected from those who entered the supposed giveaway. Participants were required to provide their first and last names, email address, postal address, and phone number as a condition of entering the alleged lottery.
The lawsuit claims that Musk has profited off this supposed giveaway by driving traffic to his social media platform X (formerly known as Twitter), and that he can now profit further by using or selling participants' personal information. Musk and America PAC largely failed to state how signatories' personal information would be used or stored, the form merely noting that phone numbers specifically "will only be used to confirm you are the legitimate petition signer."
"[The plaintiffs] having now discovered no legitimate lottery existed, and that they provided their personal identifying information to Defendants for nothing in exchange, now demand Defendant be enjoined from using the data or otherwise providing it to third parties," the complaint states.
An NBC News report published last week found that of the $1 million lottery's first 14 winners, nine were registered Republicans. Of the remaining five, three had publicly voiced support for Republican candidate Donald Trump, and one had described himself as a former Democrat. Not a single one of the winners were registered Democrats or visible supporters of Democratic candidate Kamala Harris.
Musk himself is a vocal Trump supporter as well, though he has previously refuted allegations that he's using monetary incentives to register Republicans. The billionaire claimed that anyone who signed the petition had "a daily chance of winning" $1 million, and that they "can be from any or no political party."
It might be technically true that supporters of any political party could sign the petition for a "chance" at the $1 million prize. However, considering the statistics on the actual winners and the revelations regarding how they're chosen, it seems that your odds are infinitely better if your political beliefs align with Musk's.
Copyright © 2023 Powered by
Elon Musk's $1 million election giveaway has provoked a second lawsuit-粲然可观网
sitemap
文章
25
浏览
25
获赞
69293
These coronavirus trackers can help you sort through the info overload
If you're like me, the daily barrage of information about the progress of the coronavirus pandemic cIt sounds like Amazon's wireless earbuds will double as fitness trackers
Looks like AirPods could have some competition from Amazon. CNBC reported on Monday that the Jeff BSignal could make NBA's tampering problem even harder to solve
Signal is reportedly becoming popular in the sports world. While the free iOS and Android app—Apple's coronavirus keynote was slick but extremely dystopian
This is the world of the 2020 apocalypse, where pre-recorded propaganda segments are brought to youHere's that creepy Rami Malek ad mashed with music from Jordan Peele's 'Us'
It's been an entire month since Rami Malek's promotional video for Mandarin Oriental hotels made theAfter mass shootings, Google told Congress his arrest was progress. But the truth is complicated.
“I hate myself,” wrote a YouTube user named “The Hammer.”“I am uglierYou can win up to $25,000 by keeping your finger on your phone
How much time are your fingers on your phone on any given day? Probably hours, right?Thanks to MSCHFCongress should pass ban on police using facial recognition technology
Earlier this year, for the first time (that we know of), a false match by a facial recognition algorEU is investigating Apple Pay and App Store for breaking competition rules
The European Commission has launched two formal investigations into Apple's business practices overSignal's new blur tool will help hide protesters' identities
Secure messaging app Signal has announced a new in-app blur tool that will allow users to censor facYou can try out Apple's Deep Fusion photo feature in latest iOS beta
Apple's Deep Fusion photography feature, which uses machine learning to improve photos taken in lessThe 14 best tweets of the week, from soup tubes to Flavortown
Phew, another week of quarantine down. This one feel long to you? Same, pal, same.Anyway, we've doneMeghan McCain's complaining wedding guest is now a beautiful meme
If you're a guest at someone's wedding, you probably shouldn't insult them in front of thousands ofDuring a pandemic, protest livestreams are more important than ever
Protests against police brutality continue around the country, but not everyone who wants can particA massive dark web child porn site was brought down by tracing bitcoin
Say it with me: Bitcoin is not anonymous. Three hundred and thirty-seven alleged members of a massiv